Practical Science on Movement and Pain

Quite a Stretch – Guest Post From Paul Ingraham

Here is a guest post from Paul Ingraham, a former massage therapist and current health science journalist and copyeditor for ScienceBasedMedicine.org, and creator of the excellent website SaveYourself.ca. His website has an extensive collection of well researched ebooks and articles on a wide variety of topics related to common therapies for chronic pain and athletic performance, especially muscle pain and some common overuse injuries like IT band syndrome and plantar fasciitis. His approach is very skeptical and evidence based, and as such he does a lot of debunking, which I like. Here is his take on the alleged benefits of stretching.*

QUITE A STRETCH

Why is it that many Kenyans don’t stretch? Why was legendary coach Arthur Lydiard not a fan of stretching? Why does Galloway say, “In my experience runners who stretch are injured more often, and when they stop stretching, the injuries often go away”?

— Bob Cooper, Runner’s World Magazine.1

Stretching is a comfortable and reassuring ritual for many people — it’s simple, it feels good, and it seems to promise easy benefits. For countless more, athletes and couch potatoes alike, stretching weighs on their conscience — one more thing you are supposed to find the time to do. Can all these people be barking up the wrong tree? Sure they can! And they are.

Plentiful recent research now shows that stretching as we know it — the kind of stretching that the average person does at the gym, or even the kind of stretching that athletes do — could very well be a waste of time. Articles published in recent years, reviewing hundreds of studies, have concluded that there isn’t much evidence that stretching prevents injury or muscle soreness.2, 3 Adding significantly to the credibility of those reviews, a major year 2000 clinical study of many hundreds of soldiers showed no sign of benefit from and even some risks to stretching.4

So why are people stretching?

Why people stretch

Trainers, coaches and health care professionals are starting to insist on making recommendations based on evidence, or at least a really convincing physiological rationale … and stretching just doesn’t hold up very well under that scrutiny.  When challenged, many stretching enthusiasts have a hard time explaining why they are stretching. The value of stretching has been elevated to dogma without justification. Everyone just “knows” that it’s a good thing.

When pressed for reasons, people will come up with a few predictable stretching goals. Here are the four hopeful reasons for stretching that I hear every day:

  1. warming up
  2. prevention of muscle soreness
  3. prevention of injury
  4. flexibility

And sometimes you also hear:

  1. “performance enhancement” (faster sprinting, for instance)

Not one of these can be supported with evidence, or even has a persuasive rationale. Stretching for these reasons is probably a waste of your time.

Stretching research shows that stretching is not an effective warm up

Warming up is an unclear goal with many possible meanings. The most obvious and literal — an actual increase in tissue temperature — is a reasonable goal. It’s literally true that warm muscles function better than cold ones.

However, body heat is generated by metabolic activity, particularly muscle contractions. And it’s impossible to raise your metabolic activity without working up a sweat, which can’t be achieved by stretching alone. You simply cannot “warm up” your muscles by stretching them: that’s like trying to cook a steak by pulling on it. Instead, the best way to warm up is probably to start by doing a kinder/gentler version of the activity you have in mind: e.g., walking before you run.

Metaphorically, “warming up” also refers to readiness for activity or body awareness. You are “warm” in this sense when you are neurologically responsive and coordinated: when your reflexes are sensitive and some adrenalin is pumping. Warm up for its own sake (i.e., without following it up with more intense exercise) is fairly pointless — the goal is to prevent injury and enhance performance. And those goals may be realistic. For instance, research has shown that a warm up routine focused on these goals actually might provide significant insurance against the number and severity of both traumatic and overuse-caused injuries.7

So, warm ups in this second sense might be helpful … but does stretching warm you up in this sense? No, probably not much — certainly no more than a bunch of other exercises you could do — and quite possibly not at all. The most compelling evidence that stretching doesn’t warm you up is the evidence that shows that it doesn’t prevent injury or enhance performance (discussed below). Static stretch is somewhat stimulating to tissue, but in ways that are quite different from most actual activities.

Because of all this, stretching to warm up barely even qualifies as “official” exercise dogma anymore — most professionals actually gave up on it many years ago, and it is passé even in the opinion of many joggers, weekend warriors and other amateurs. Yet there are still far too many people out there stretching before they run, trying to “warm up” almost exclusively by standing still and elongating muscles! Once again, the best way to prepare for an activity is probably to start it slowly.

Stretching research shows that stretching does not prevent delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS)

Another popular idea about stretching is that it prevents that insidious deep tenderness that follows a hard workout. That soreness is called “delayed onset muscle soreness,” or DOMS for short. People believe that stretching can help DOMS like its religion.  This does not make it true. Unfortunately, the evidence strongly suggests that stretching is completely useless for preventing DOMS. In fact, many studies have shown that nothing short of amputation can prevent DOMS — and certainly not stretching.6, 7 Think of DOMS as a tax on exercise. As one clever commentator put it, “Only soreness can prevent soreness.”

Stretching research shows that stretching does not prevent injury

According to the evidence, stretching probably does not prevent injury. As I mentioned above, this has been suggested by a combination of recent literature reviews and large clinical studies, some of which I have already cited. Here’s some more.

In 2005, Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine published a review of the scientific evidence to date, and found that the (admittedly limited) evidence “showed stretching had no effect in reducing injuries.”8 Neither poor quality nor higher quality studies reported any injury prevention effect. Regardless of whether stretching was of individual muscles or entire groups, there was no reduction in injury rates.

More experimental research has been done since. For instance, a 2008 study published in American Journal of Sports Medicine showed “no significant differences in incidence of injury” in 500 soldiers doing preventative exercises, including stretching.9

I’m never surprised by such findings, because I’ve never heard a sensible explanation for how stretching can generally prevent injury. Usually, advocates have a vague notion that “longer” muscles are less likely to get strained: even if garden-variety stretching made muscles longer (which is doubtful in itself), and even if we knew exactly what kind of stretching to do (we don’t), and even if we had the time to stretch every significant muscle group, the benefits would still be relevant to only a small fraction of common sports injuries. An ankle sprain, for instance, or a blown knee — two of the most common of all injuries — probably have nothing to do with muscle length.

Hardly anyone needs to be more flexible

“I want to be more flexible,” people say, even when they have normal range of motion in every joint. What’s this about? Why are people so worried about being more flexible?

Most people have a normal range of motion — that’s why it’s normal! Unless you are specifically frustrated because you lack sufficient range of motion in a joint to perform a task, you probably don’t need to be more flexible.

Obviously, stretching can be effective at increasing flexibility — acrobats, gymnasts, yogis and martial artists have been doing it for centuries, sometimes achieving uncanny mobility. But these are highly motivated athletes with specific and extreme goals and stretching regimes that would intimidate the rest of us, and with good reason: they often injure themselves along the way.

Stretching probably doesn’t enhance performance (and it definitely doesn’t make you spring faster)

You don’t hear this argument for stretching as often as your hear the others. And yet it comes up, especially with athletes who play team sports. It’s a common practice to stretch when you’re off the field. The habit is probably usually rationalized as an injury prevention method, but many of those athletes will also claim that it enhances performance — that the muscles “spring back” from the stretch and make them run faster. There’s actually an entire stretching book that is largely based on this idea (The Stark Reality of Stretching: An informed approach for all activities and every sport) — but that book is conspicuously full of armchair science, and no actual evidence that the ideas are true.

Predictably, research has shown that stretching does not improve sprinting. More surprisingly, research has shown the opposite. What happens to your sprint if you stretch first? All other things being equal, the athlete who didn’t stretch is going to leave you behind!10

So … is stretching good for anything?

Probably not for the reasons or in the manner most people are stretching, no — not much good, anyway, and certainly not in a way anyone has figured out how to measure.

Notes

  1. Cooper, Bob. “The Rules Revisited.” Runner’s World. September, 2009. p. 59.
  2. Shrier. Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine. 1999.
  3. Herbet et al. British Medical Journal. 2002.
  4. Pope RP, Herbert RD, Kirwan JD, et al. A randomized trial of preexercise stretching for prevention of lower-limb injury. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 2000;32:271–7.
  5. Soligard et al. British Medical Journal. 2008.
  6. Cheung K, Hume P, Maxwell L. Delayed onset muscle soreness : treatment strategies and performance factors. Sports Medicine 2003;33(2):145-64.
  7. Weber MD, Serevedio FJ, Woodall WR. The Effects of Three Modalities on Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness. Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 20(5):236-42, 1994 November.
  8. Hart. “Effect of stretching on sport injury risk: a review.” Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine. 2005.
  9. Brushøj et al. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2008.
  10. Beckett et al. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2009.

*You can read the full version of Paul’s stretching article at SaveYourself.ca.

Enjoy the post?
Sign up for blog post updates and get an e-report on improving mobility.

27 Responses to Quite a Stretch – Guest Post From Paul Ingraham

  1. [...] here to read the rest: Quite a Stretch – Guest Post From Paul Ingraham « Better Movement ← PPT : Sports Eye Injury Prevention Center : Best Resource of PPT [...]

  2. [...] and prevent a hamstring pull during a sprint or kick? Studies have shown repeatedly that pregame stretching does absolutely nothing to prevent injuries, and in fact makes you slower and less explosive for a short period after the stretch. Part of the [...]

  3. [...] Quite a Stretch – Guest Post From Paul Ingraham (toddhargrove.wordpress.com) [...]

  4. [...] Based on this evidence, I think the best that could be said for stretching is that it might not make you slower. (This assumes you are not sprinting, in which case it will definitely make you slower.) By the way, another thing we can say about stretching is that it definitely won’t help prevent injuries. [...]

  5. [...] tip to previous guest poster Paul Ingraham at saveyourself.ca. (Do I need to point out that Paul got the news from Jason [...]

  6. Kate Ford says:

    Is stretching required in every massage. If I have an injured patients MUST I stretch them during my massage?

  7. [...] and prevent a hamstring pull during a sprint or kick? Studies have shown repeatedly that pregame stretching does absolutely nothing to prevent injuries, and in fact makes you slower and less explosive for a short period after the stretch. Part of the [...]

  8. [...] for another guest post from Paul Ingraham, his second. He contributed a post last November about stretching myths. Paul is a former massage therapist and current health science journalist and copyeditor for [...]

  9. Great article – very specific info on the effects of stretching prior to performance. Most of the article is backed by quality evidence that has become accepted throughout the physical therapy and fitness community. What is not addressed here and in much of the literature is the long-term effects of stretching (or not).

    The author suggests that most people do not need to be more flexible. According to a recent study by the CDC (http://goo.gl/TsKrX), the risk of having symptoms of osteoarthritis in at least one knee by age 85 was 45.5 percent. That’s only in the knee, suggesting that more than 1/2 the population will live with arthritis in their lifetime.

    There are several ways to prevent arthritis and stretching is one of them. Now I don’t believe that stretching alone is the cure for arthritis, but increasing flexibility and relieving stress on the joints is one element of a joint preservation program. A stretching program can also improve exercise performance as indicated by this article from the ACSM – http://goo.gl/Q9Rix

    Stretching has gotten a bad rad lately. I’ve recently read several articles and blogs downplaying the value of stretching. The bottom line is that stretching is not a quick fix. Over the long haul it will increase muscle elasticity, overall flexibility, and performance.

  10. [...] Two important takeaways here. First, genetics matter. Second, don’t stretch to get faster. Or to prevent injuries.) [...]

  11. [...] the benefits of stretching transfer from one side to the other? Well, I’m not sure there are any benefits to stretching. Maybe we should consider its detriments. It has been shown many times that static stretching will [...]

  12. Gary Gurney says:

    I’m curious about what’s considered “normal” range of motion. I believe normal range of motion should include the capacity to sit comfortably in a squat, feet flat, for at least 5 minutes. In my observation, I would say less than 1 percent of the general population can do that. And my most “fit” clients are no more capable of doing this than the “unfit” ones. But if you go to any Asian or African country, you will find almost everyone (who does not have western style furniture) can squat for hours comfortably right into old age.

    Maybe I’m mistaken, but you seem to imply that stretching is not good for anyone, yet the studies you cite all seem to involve athletes rather than people who only say do a yoga routine as their only regular “exercise”.

    I think it’s impossible to make sound conclusions about this stuff without doing cross cultural studies….or at least it’s important to recognize the lens through which we look and the assumptions we make are hugely influenced by cultural attitudes and do not necessarily represent the human experience in a more general sense.

    Our culture values a type of fitness that’s almost beyond comprehension for most of the rest of the world even though the vast majority in our culture don’t have this level of “fitness”. And, I’d bet that the most “fit” in our culture, generally have many more physical maladies (arthritis, knee, injuries, hip injuries etc.) than the general population of say people in, say southeast Asia.

    • Gary,

      Thanks for the comments.

      First, I should point out that this is Paul’s article but I agree with almost all of it, so I will respond.

      I think an optimal range of motion for healthy hips would be sitting in a squat as you say and also sitting on the ground legs out straight in front with the pelvis in neutral. Most westerners can’t come anywhere near doing this as you say. I would love to see some studies on whether squatting and ground sitting cultures have less pain. My guess is they would be better off.

      However, that doesn’t mean that stretching is a cure for western tight hips, or that it would help with pain or dysfunction. My guess is that these ranges of motion are lost because of chairs, and that once they are lost they are not really recoverable, save for heroic amounts of stretching. And if they can be recovered, I’m not sure there would be any benefit to performance or pain. The body doesn’t like to be deformed into a different shape.

      The studies are clear that stretching does not prevent injury or improve performance. Would the result be different in a different culture? I can’t imagine why it would.

      • Gary Gurney says:

        Part of my point was that the studies cited asked the question about preventing injury and improving performance. This is specific to athletes, not the general population.

        I agree that stretching the IT band is a poor solution to IT band pain. And that’s the problem, I think, with much of the stretching advice given by PT’s, docs, etc. is that they tend to give one to three local stretches as therapy. What if “stretching” meant undertaking a basic yoga routine that worked the entire body? I’ve seen time and time again people undertake moderate yoga practices and either completely eliminate their pain or greatly reduce it. I’ll admit too, I’ve seen it fail, but not nearly as often as I’ve seen it succeed for those who try it and stick with it.

        I think that yoga (which may not be stretching from your POV, but I’m not sure where you stand on this) probably works because it has the effect of reducing stress in the global sense and that with less stress, there is generally less pain. Perhaps it conditions people to tolerate a large range of sensation and effectively de-sensitizes the nervous system?

        Simply because most people can’t re-shape their bodies that drastically, does that mean it’s useless to move in that direction? I don’t think so. In my experience, most everyone feels better when they increase their ROM even in moderate amounts.

        And, I still take issue with citing studies that use athletes and then extrapolating to the general population and saying things like
        “stretching doesn’t improve performance or prevent injury, so it’s of no use to anyone”. The New York Times WellBlog does this repeatedly, as if every one is in training for some endurance event, when, in fact, it’s a subculture and not the “norm”.

        Thanks for this blog, btw, I enjoy it greatly!

  13. Gary Barber says:

    Interesting article, very glad you didn’t discount flexibility for some sports, like Rock Climbing.

    In Rock Climbing flexibility is a requirement to improving performance. Cross training with yoga based stretching, for instance, can increase flexibility which will improve application of correct climbing techniques.

    • Gary,

      I don’t know enough about rock climbing to judge whether it requires unusual flexibility. Do you have any pics of climbers showing extreme ranges of motion? Perhaps in hip abduction? I can certainly imagine that usual strength is needed at the end ranges of motion, but that is not the same thing as flexibility.

  14. I read the article quite a stretch and was surprised not only to not find any new information but also a rather narrow and limited viewpoint and lack of experience in a wide area of sports and also everyday western population. I agree with Gary Gurneys response.. what is considered normal? Your reply , which states for example ‘stiff’ hips being a lifestyle problem and not reversible.
    I am a pilates and nia teacher, which incoporates feldenkrais and 5 stages of development, similar to mind body centring.
    Firstly all 5 reasons you stated that people give for stretching are by the public and not experts, so while it is what you here, it is like you said incorrect.
    Expect 4. flexibility. What a misunderstood idea that is. And sounds like you dont know either. The kenyons may not need to stretch because their lifestyles are different, how many of them sit in a chair and office or stand on a shop floor for hours on end or sit in a car for hours!!!excuse my ignorance, but I bet not many. stretching does help to balance muscle indifferences that happen as we ‘abuse’ the body by keeping it in prolonged positions. However, lets take the spine (as Gary as already covered hip flexors :)) I have many many clients that come with back ache. most have if not all, restricted movement in the spine (and HIPs big time!) stretching in a true sense moves not just the muscles but is allowing a bigger range of motion of joints. If muscles are tight , how can the spine flex and extend or rotate? I have clients who dont use eyes or necks or waist but almost pick the whole trunk to look whats behind them when driving?!
    And there was the feedback about osteoarthritis.. this is true also, while it doesnt cure all arthritis it can help and prevent. if muscles are tight and as they do cross over the joint , they pull the joint and compress it.
    as for climbing, yes climbing does need and benefit form stretching. I have recently (in the last 5 years ) been ensuring my father stretches- he is delighted that at nearly 70 he feels he’s dropped 10 years in his climbing ability and swears by it!!!
    goodness me.. its old hat to know that stretching is no benefit to pre sport. it may be news to joe public- but those in the profession- this is not groundbreaking.

  15. apologies for grammar and spelling.

  16. Jeff says:

    Very interesting article. What would be your opinion with regards to stretching and dance (especially ballet)? Needless to say, stretching is an integral part of dance. The ability to perform even the most basic moves would be impossible without many hours dedicated to flexability. Is that essentially the answer? Stretching improves flexability to allow increased range of motion in order to complete the moves…but essentially nothing else?

  17. John says:

    Very very and i find the need to repeat myself VERY misinformed article. Stretching is THE key to longevity. It reinstates the body into a more youthful flexible state that wears down as we age. It wrings off old crusty energy and reinvigorates the cells in our body with new nutrients and energy and helps dispose of stagnant waste material. It is the single most important you can do for yourself to fight off diseases and illnesses. This author criticisms of stretching seems quite misdirected. For example he keeps referring to stretching as a way to elongate the muscles when in fact when you stretching you are actually focusing on developing the tendons. This keeps the tendons soft and tender like a young child’s would be and keeps us mobile as we age. If you do not stretch, or stretch for stretching’s sake, as the author likes to call it, those tendons will harden over time, to the point where you lose all mobility into your old age. His points about stretching decreasing athletic performance is just nominal and i seriously doubt it would decrease a runner’s speed any significant amount at all. Just an obtuse unenlightened article.

    • Todd Hargrove says:

      Hi John,

      Your comment makes me think of a quote from Christopher Hitchens: “That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.”

  18. john says:

    Hi i posted a comment on here earlier and it seems the author deleted it. What a cowardly pathetic move.

  19. john says:

    oops sorry my apologies. It was NOT deleted.

  20. Erick says:

    I can’t speak for everyone else, and my personal experience and opinions will not apply to everyone. That being said, I have personally experienced improved range of motion, measurably, through combining stretching and movement.
    For an article that is making such a large blanket statement on stretching and flexibility, it doesn’t say much about what type of stretching and when. Static stretching of cold muscles is far different than dynamic stretching of warm muscles through a useful range of motion. For example, a lateral lunge with a slow and controlled movement on muscles that have been warmed up through movement is entirely different than a static hamstring stretch sitting on the floor with cold muscles. The author says very little about the wide range of ways people can stretch muscles, which limits the potential usefulness of this article. The author also has an absolute ton of articles dismissing all kinds of approaches to exercise and therapy only to inform you he has better solutions if you just buy his stuff.

    • Todd Hargrove says:

      Hi Erik,

      It seems to me that your objection to the article is that it does not acknowledge that stretching can increase flexibility.

      However, the article specifically states that stretching is a way to increase flexibility. The major claims are instead that flexibility is not that important, and that stretching does not decrease risk of injury.

Leave a reply